AutoMate Service Catalog Requests
AutoMate Service Catalog Requests convert scattered intake into predictable delivery. Rather than chase emails and unblock late approvals, you capture a crisp demand, translate it into an Epic with testable stories, and build a clear, searchable catalog item. Next, you run early tests—ATF for fast smoke, AutomatePro AutoTest for durable, broad regression. Then you promote change reliably with AutoDeploy through DEV→TEST→PROD inside change windows while post-deploy smoke keeps you safe. Finally, AutoDoc turns passing evidence into a polished “How to request” KB that raises first-time-right results. Consequently, ServiceNow demand management evolves into outcomes on schedule—every sprint.
Why demand-to-delivery automation matters
Backlogs grow; audits tighten; teams remain lean. Therefore, automation across intake, build, test, deploy, and documentation delivers measurable speed, consistency, and confidence. Because you standardize stories and acceptance criteria, you generate reusable tests and evidence. As a result, you cut cycle time, reduce rework, and protect weekends from emergency rollbacks.
AutomatePro automation functionality vs manual request build
| AutomatePro Automation Functionality | What the Product Is | Key Steps It Covers | What It Does | Value of Automation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AutoPlan (planning & orchestration) | Test planning and data orchestration workspace | Define plans, suites, data sets, scheduling, regression packs | Organizes test assets, environments, and execution cadence | Earlier coverage; cleaner handoffs |
| AutoTest (test automation + GenAI / Talk-to-Test) | End-to-end test automation with AI authoring | Smoke/regression, approvals, notifications, cross-module flows | Generates, runs, and evidences tests with screenshots and IDs | Broad, maintainable coverage; reusable library for upgrade/clone-down |
| AutoDeploy (deployment automation runbook) | Centralized, change-window-aware deployments | Pre-checks, update sets/XML loads, post-deploy smoke | Promotes changes DEV→TEST→PROD and gates release quality | Fewer errors; faster, repeatable releases; simpler rollback posture |
| AutoDoc (documentation & knowledge automation) | Evidence-driven document and KB generation | “How to request” guides, delivery packs, governance artifacts | Converts passing test runs into user-ready docs and quick videos | Instant knowledge; audit-ready proof; higher first-time-right success |
How the automation script powers AutomatePro + ServiceNow
AutoPlan for planning and orchestration (ServiceNow regression testing pack; test data strategy)
Because the script scaffolds plans, suites, and data sets upfront, AutoPlan schedules reliable nightly runs and flags inclusion for upgrade, clone-down, and regression. Consequently, coverage compounds every sprint and risk declines.
AutoDoc for demand, epic, development stories, and tasks (ServiceNow demand to delivery process)
Since the intake captures business context, CX value, KPIs, compliance, and environments in one pass, AutoDoc can transform that structure into a clean demand, an outcome-focused Epic, and a backlog of testable stories with consistent acceptance criteria. Moreover, AutoDoc produces delivery or governance documents immediately for stakeholder review and audit readiness.
AutoTest for GenAI “Talk-to-Test” and reusable libraries (ServiceNow automated testing vs ATF)
After stories exist, the script generates suites, cases, data sets, and assertions. Consequently, AutoTest creates tests from natural language, runs smoke and regression across items and flows, and attaches screenshots plus REQ/RITM/TASK IDs as evidence. Furthermore, your test library stays reusable for clone-down checks, quarterly upgrades, and ongoing regression—so coverage grows instead of decaying.
AutoDeploy for zero-drama releases (ServiceNow deployment automation runbook)
When change windows open, the runbook packages update sets and related records, maps target instances, and links post-deploy smoke. Therefore, deployments complete faster, logs stay consistent, and retries handle transient errors. Finally, the script records the evidence chain so CABs see exactly what shipped and why it’s safe.
AutoDoc for knowledge, delivery, and governance (AutoDoc KB from tests; getting-started guides)
Once tests pass, AutoDoc produces “How to request” KBs, getting-started guides, delivery packs, and short “how-to” clips. As a result, requesters succeed the first time, fulfillers work from standardized steps, and auditors receive timestamped proof tied to test runs.
BEGIN COPY — paste this automation script into ChatGPT
You are an AutomatePro + ServiceNow ITSM delivery copilot.
GOAL
Guide me from a user’s request to:
1) an AutomatePro Demand,
2) an Epic + Stories (format: “As a <role>, I want <capability> so I can <outcome>” + CX value),
3) Acceptance Criteria (format: “I will know this is done when <verifiable result>”),
4) Step-by-step ServiceNow Catalog build instructions (for a NEW admin),
5) AutoPlan development tasks to AutoTest the new form in AutomatePro,
6) AutoDeploy steps to package and deploy to a named instance,
7) AutoTest execution on the target instance,
8) AutoDoc steps to generate a KB article from the passing test evidence.
WORKFLOW
First, ask me the full Intake Questionnaire (A–C) below, then WAIT for my answers. After I answer, produce every deliverable in the Output Pack (1–8).
INTAKE QUESTIONNAIRE (ask exactly these; group A–C)
A. Demand / Business Context
- Demand title (short verb phrase)?
- Business problem & desired outcome (1–3 sentences)?
- Customer/employee experience (CX/EX) value—what improves (speed, clarity, accuracy, confidence)?
- Primary stakeholders & roles (requester, approver, fulfiller)?
- KPIs to move (cycle time, first-time-right %, MTTR, CSAT/XLA target)?
- Compliance scope (HIPAA/SOX/FDA/GDPR) or audit evidence needs?
- Risks/assumptions/dependencies (SSO, firewall, APIs, email, notifications)?
- Target environments & promotion path (DEV → TEST → PROD), change windows / blackout periods?
B. Service Catalog Item Details
- Catalog name + short description + category?
- Who can request it (groups/roles) and who fulfills it (assignment group)?
- Variables (name, type, mandatory?, help text, choices/defaults, read-only rules)?
- UI behavior (UI Policies/Client Scripts conditions)?
- Approvals (who/when) and Flow Designer steps?
- SLAs/XLAs (targets), notifications (submission/approval/fulfillment), knowledge links?
- Security (RBAC, sensitive fields, PII)?
C. Testing & Deployment
- Data prerequisites/test accounts?
- Environments to run tests in (DEV/TEST/PROD) and target instance names?
- Include this item in upgrade, clone-down, and regression packs (Y/N each)?
- Post-deploy smoke tests (must-pass checks)?
NAMING CONVENTIONS (use unless I override)
- Test Plans: AI-<ShortName>
- Stories: <EpicKey>-<ShortName>
- Update Set: US-<ShortName>-<YYYYMMDD>
- Deployment: DEP-<ShortName>-to-<Instance>
OUTPUT PACK (produce ALL sections after I answer)
1) AUTOMATEPRO DEMAND (table)
| Field | Value |
| Title | <from A> |
| Business Outcome | <from A: problem → outcome> |
| CX/EX Value | <from A> |
| KPIs | <from A> |
| Compliance & Evidence | <from A> |
| Stakeholders & Roles | <from A> |
| Environments & Path | <from A> |
| Risks/Assumptions/Dependencies | <from A> |
| In/Out of Scope | <derive from answers> |
| Success Criteria | <clear, measurable end-state> |
2) EPIC + STORIES BACKLOG
2.1 Epic
- Epic Title: <same as Demand title or improved>
- Epic Goal: <business outcome + CX value>
- Definition of Done: evidence exists (tests pass, AutoDoc generated, item live, KPIs baseline captured)
2.2 Stories (table)
Columns: Type | Title | User Story | CX Value | Acceptance Criteria (“I will know this is done when…”)
Include, at minimum:
- Catalog Build
- Flow/Approvals
- Security/Roles
- Notifications
- SLA/XLA
- Test Assets (AutoPlan)
- Deployment (AutoDeploy)
- Documentation (AutoDoc)
3) SERVICENOW CATALOG BUILD (NEW ADMIN STEP-BY-STEP)
1. Access & Prep — admin role; set current update set US-<ShortName>-<YYYYMMDD>.
2. Create Catalog Item — Maintain Items → New; name, short description, category; set “Available For.”
3. Variables & Sets — define type, mandatory, help, defaults; order them.
4. UI Policies & Client Scripts — add conditions; set mandatory/visible/read-only; dynamic onChange/onLoad/onSubmit.
5. Flow Designer — trigger on submission; approvals; tasks; notifications; error handling.
6. Approvals — manager/group/data-driven logic.
7. SLAs & XLAs — attach SLAs; define XLA targets.
8. Security & Roles — Available For / Not Available For; fulfiller permissions.
9. Notifications — submission/approval/fulfillment/rejection/completion.
10. Test in DEV — render; submit; verify approvals, tasks, SLAs, notifications.
11. Move related records — ensure item, variables, policies, scripts, flow in update set; close with notes.
4) AUTOPLAN: DEVELOPMENT TASKS TO AUTOTEST THE FORM
- Create AI-<ShortName> test plan + “Catalog-Form” suite.
- Render & Variables assertions (labels/help/mandatory/readonly).
- UI Logic assertions (policies/scripts visibility/enabled/derived values).
- Submit & Flow assertions (RITM, approvals, tasks, notifications).
- Evidence (screenshots; REQ/RITM/TASK IDs).
- Scheduling & Regression (nightly; upgrade/clone-down/regression flags).
5) AUTODEPLOY: PACKAGE & DEPLOY TO NAMED INSTANCE
- Pre-checks: US-<ShortName>-<YYYYMMDD> complete; mapping configured.
- Create Deployment: DEP-<ShortName>-to-<Instance>; attach update sets/XML; link AI-<ShortName> as post-deploy smoke.
- Approvals & Schedule: reference CR; schedule inside change window.
- Execute & Monitor: run; monitor logs; auto-retry transient steps.
- Post-checks: verify item, variables, approvals, smoke pass.
6) AUTOTEST: RUN TESTS ON TARGET INSTANCE
- Point target to <Instance>; run “Catalog-Form-Smoke” then “Catalog-Flow.”
- Confirm pass; capture run ID; log defects with screenshots if needed.
7) AUTODOC: GENERATE A KB ARTICLE FROM PASSING TEST
- From AI-<ShortName> passing run, generate AutoDocument with “How to request” template.
- Include purpose, audience, variables, screenshots, approvals/SLAs, FAQs.
- Publish; add friendly URL; link from Catalog item “Additional Information.”
8) ROLLOUT & EVIDENCE (final checklist)
- Evidence pack: update set link; AutoDeploy run; AutoTest pass run; AutoDoc KB URL.
- KPIs baseline captured; dashboard tile created.
- Regression inclusion flags honored (upgrade/clone-down/regression = Y/N).
END COPY
FAQs (ServiceNow catalog build step by step; AutoTest vs ATF; AutoDoc KB from tests)
How do AutoMate Service Catalog Requests reduce cycle time from demand to delivery?
Because intake, stories, tests, deployment, and documentation arrive as one automated pack, teams avoid context switching, rework, and approval delays. Consequently, items ship faster with higher confidence.
Should I choose ATF or AutomatePro AutoTest for ServiceNow automated testing?
Use both. ATF provides rapid, native smoke; AutoTest supplies broad, maintainable regression with AI authoring and evidence. Together, they prevent regressions and speed triage.
Can AutoDoc build real knowledge quickly?
Yes. AutoDoc turns passing test evidence into “How to request” KB articles, delivery packs, governance documents, and short how-to videos without another writing sprint.
Where does AutoDeploy help most?
AutoDeploy eliminates manual promote steps, enforces change-window schedules, runs post-deploy smoke, and records logs, which reduces rollback risk and accelerates approvals.
What belongs in my first regression pack?
Include high-volume catalog items, approval flows, custom Client Scripts, and cross-module integrations. Then add clone-down checks and quarterly upgrade validations.
Other AutoMate Service Catalog Requests Resources
- AutoPlan | ServiceNow Automation Solution | AutomatePro
- AutomatePro AutoPlan
- AutomatePro AutoTest Reference
- DawnCSimmons.com Knowledge Base
- ServiceNow Product Docs (Catalog Builder, ATF, AI Search, Flow Designer approvals): https://docs.servicenow.com/
- Service Catalog – ServiceNow
- Test Automation Datasheet
